default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

City Cracks Down on St. Vincent Court Outdoor Tables - Los Angeles Downtown News - For Everything Downtown L.A.!: News

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

City Cracks Down on St. Vincent Court Outdoor Tables

Property Dispute Leads City to Order Removal of Sidewalk Tables and Chairs, Infuriating Business Owners

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, February 7, 2013 9:33 am | Updated: 3:12 pm, Fri Mar 1, 2013.

DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - When sitting at an outdoor table in St. Vincent Court, the cafe-laden alley off Seventh Street in the Jewelry District, it takes only a glint of imagination to feel transported to old Europe.

On sunny days at lunch, the tables that line the slim sidewalk and the faux-brick street are packed with patrons of the dozen Middle Eastern and Mediterranean restaurants that open to the alley. In the afternoon, jewelry business workers take seats to sip espresso and smoke cigarettes.      

It’s almost as if St. Vincent Court is a little secret in Downtown. But the better-kept secret about the open-air food court has been that the core of its character and the engine of its small businesses — the sea of outdoor seating — is illegal.

The city has long turned a blind eye to the unpermitted al fresco dining. That policy ended abruptly on Tuesday, when officials from the Bureau of Street Services dispensed notices ordering the merchants to remove their outdoor tables within 24 hours. Even the court’s longtime shoe-shiner was told to clear his stand. By Wednesday, the tables that were the trademark of the alley for more than a decade were gone.

That has put merchants like Bgos Miaramoglu, who opened the kebab restaurant Sevan Garden in the alley about 10 years ago, in a state of panic. While Sevan Garden has a sizable interior seating area, he believes that losing the outdoor tables will kill his business.

“I’m finished,” said a teary eyed Miaramoglu on Tuesday.

While the move may seem sudden, Tuesday actually marked the boiling point in a long simmering feud between St. Vincent Court property owners and the Delijani family, which owns the Los Angeles Theatre. The alley dead-ends at the theater’s rear loading doors and the outdoor tables obstruct daytime access for trucks carrying gear for everything from filming operations to rock concerts.   

Shahram Delijani, whose father Ezat Delijani purchased the Los Angeles Theatre in 1987 at the request of then Mayor Tom Bradley to save it from the wrecking ball, said the merchants have cost his family millions of dollars in lost filming-related revenue over the past 10 years. The family long resisted filing a complaint and triggering the crackdown, he said, because they hoped to negotiate a compromise that would allow for outdoor tables and protect theater access.

After after a round of lengthy negotiations last summer failed to produce a compromise, Delijani recently filed a complaint, prompting the 24-hour notices issued Tuesday.

Deal Goes Cold

The 1931 theater is a popular filming location, but productions must rent an adjacent parking lot on Hill Street to store equipment and park trucks, instead of backing up to the loading area. Some productions ultimately film elsewhere to avoid the cost of renting the lot, Delijani said.

Now, in concert with 14th District City Councilman José Huizar’s Bringing Back Broadway initiative, Delijani said he is looking to program more live entertainment at the theater, making the loading issue pressing.

“This isn’t just about my family profiting from the theater, this is about activating the city’s namesake theater, the nationally registered historic landmark,” Delijani said. “When my dad purchased and maintained the theater at a huge expense, he would have never imagined that its future would potentially have been jeopardized because of some restaurants in an alley blocking access to our loading doors. It’s ludicrous.”

St. Vincent Jewelry Center owner Peklar Pilavjian, who counts seven of the alley merchants as his tenants, said he has made several attempts to legalize the outdoor seating.

Last year, he, Delijani and city officials, including a representative of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, tried but failed to broker a compromise. During negotiations, Delijani said he agreed in part to a proposal to widen the sidewalks in the alley from five to nine feet, leaving ample room for sidewalk dining. Pilavjian, who would have been responsible for most of the approximately $90,000 worth of work, supported the concept even though the street tables would have been eliminated.

But Delijani insisted that two spaces large enough to accommodate 72-foot-long trucks would have to be set aside exclusively for the theater. One of the proposed spaces is in front of a building owned by Pilavjian, who balked at the prospect of losing access to the parking slot.

That’s when talks broke down, said Pilavjian, who fully acknowledges that the outdoor dining conflicts with city code.

“I know I don’t have any legal recourse,” Pilavjian said. “I’m hoping to appeal to the fairness doctrine of our esteemed mayor to realize that the livelihoods of many people — and it’s not mine — are going to be lost.”

Those people include Kacin Celik, who opened Tulip Café in St. Vincent Court four years ago. The cafe has nine outdoor tables, some of which seat up to six people, and five smaller tables inside. On Tuesday at about 1 p.m., the patio was full. Not a single indoor table was occupied.

“This is my business’ heart,” said Celik, as he gestured to the patio, which was temporarily covered in a plastic enclosure warmed by heat lamps. “If I don’t have this I close the store. I sell it right away.”

Celik said he knew that the outdoor seating arrangement was a code violation when he opened his business. But after years of city tolerance, he never expected enforcement.

Huizar spokesman Rick Coca said there was no way to soften the blow on the merchants once Street Services was directed to enforce the code.

“We recognize the arguments on both sides and would really like to see an amicable solution,” Coca said. “When the dust settles after these actions, we would still hope that that’s possible.”

For now, Celik, Miaramoglu and other merchants will have to apply for conditional use permits to allow tables on the sidewalks in St. Vincent Court. Such permits are discretionary and could be denied. 

Delijani rejected the notion that Pilavjian or the St. Vincent Court merchants are victims.

“I didn’t want it to come to this,” he said. “It’s a simple black and white issue: they’re illegal. They should have taken the deal that would have kept them there, but they weren’t willing to give me an inch.” 

With the alley cleared, access to the theater may nevertheless face new challenges. While trucks can reach loading docks through the alley, parking for long stints will require permits.

Like the permits for sidewalk dining, production-related approvals are discretionary. FilmL.A., the nonprofit that coordinates film permits for the city, is required to reach out to businesses near the shoot location. When location managers visit St. Vincent Court to notify merchants of future productions and proposed truck parking, Pilavjian warned that they should expect to meet some disgruntled shopkeepers.

“These guys are going to make hell,” he said.  

Contact Ryan Vaillancourt at


More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Michael Richardson posted at 10:02 am on Tue, Feb 19, 2013.

    mrichardson Posts: 1

    I am new to Downtown so I am unfamiliar with all the politics this alley evidently has been involved with. But there is one question no one seems to be asking. The couple times I walked back there, there were cars or trucks not just driving in the alley next to the tables, but also backing up past the tables. Now since the one thing everyone agrees upon is that it was illegal for the tables to be in the alley - why hasn't anyone asked if they were illegal due to their not being safe. And if they were unsafe, why did the restaurants refuse to allow the sidewalks to be expanded to correct that problem?

  • Liliana Herrera posted at 9:02 am on Sun, Feb 17, 2013.

    got2bfree Posts: 1

    Sad news for us diners. I love Sevan's. The service and food are superb, but most of my enjoyment comes from the lunch time escape from the rat race, and the charm of dining outdoors in the Mediterranean ambience.

  • Arek Demirkiran posted at 3:06 pm on Wed, Feb 13, 2013.

    Arek Posts: 1

    @Patricia Berman
    One side is trying to widen the sidewalk to keep the tables out of the alley, while the other side only wants parking spaces for 2 trucks on a public street. Nobody even mentions that there is another access on the other side of the theater where the alley on that side is compeletely empty. Should a dozen or so hard working merchants be driven out of business cause of one man's ambition who owns several other building nearby and doesn't even need the income that comes from filming several times a year? I guess when you're rich you can have your way!

  • Jane Calderon posted at 2:27 pm on Wed, Feb 13, 2013.

    philsdeparis Posts: 6

    Awwww, this makes me sad. I used to eat there with my grandma when I was about four or five, when my mom used to work in St. Vincent. This was 1987-88. I even remember a delivery boy about 14 or 15 at the time, his name was Rudy... I think he had a crush on my mom. :P

  • dennis pierce posted at 7:10 am on Sat, Feb 9, 2013.

    Den906 Posts: 21

    The Bureau of Street Services is just another bureaucratic city department that wastes our taxpayer money.

  • Patricia Berman posted at 12:14 pm on Fri, Feb 8, 2013.

    PattiB Posts: 1

    I must be missing something. One side of this argument is doing things illegally and does not want to compromise. The other side is asking for legal access to their own building and are willing to compromise.

    Both parties could come out of this as winners. So why is this even a discussion?