default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Downtown’s 10 Worst Eyesores - Los Angeles Downtown News - For Everything Downtown L.A.!: News

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Downtown’s 10 Worst Eyesores

Abandoned Buildings and Derelict Plots That Coulda Woulda Shoulda Been Something Else

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, March 19, 2010 12:00 am

DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - It is easy to wander through Downtown Los Angeles and point to some of the gems that have arrived in the past decade. All across the community, formerly dead plots of land and abandoned buildings have been transformed into high-end housing, neighborhood-serving restaurants, office structures or even green space.

Yet in some notable cases, nothing has changed in the past 10 years, and former derelict properties continue to sit empty and/or uncared for. In certain instances the blame falls on absentee landlords, figures based far from Downtown who don’t care what happens as long as they one day make a profit on a sale. Other times, the problem is more troubling, as occurs when a governmental entity owns a building or plot and lets it tumble into eyesore status.

Los Angeles Downtown News has rounded up 10 of Downtown’s most notable, and most disturbing, languishing properties. There is a lot of variety — the list includes vacant buildings, unfinished construction sites and even a fenced-off parking lot. What they all have in common is their squandered potential. Each one, due to its size, historic status or location (many are surrounded by redevelopment) could become another boasting point, if only someone invested in it.

Instead, they all sit unused, waiting for a turnaround, whether of their owner’s volition, or from community pressure. Here, in alphabetical order, are the worst offenders, as well as what could be their next steps.

BROADWAY DUO

Location: 350-356 S. Broadway

Eyesore Factor: A pair of adjacent buildings at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Broadway have stood empty and gutted since a 2007 fire. At least one of the structures was designed by City Hall architect John Parkinson circa 1900. At the time of the fire, an official with preservationist organization the Los Angeles Conservancy told the Los Angeles Times that the buildings’ destruction was “one of the most significant losses to that district in recent memory.” Owner Eli Sasson of Sassony Commercial Real Estate Development submitted an application to demolish the buildings — which sit on a street teeming with pedestrians — more than a year ago, said his attorney Barry Gross, but was denied because he did not have a plan for replacing the buildings and so that the city could conduct a required historic assessment of the properties before they could be torn down.

What’s Next?: Sasson expects to obtain demolition approval this year, said Gross. The owner is working on a new plan for the site that would consist of a multi-story building with ground-floor retail and a yet-to-be-determined component on the upper floors. There is no timeline.

CIVIC CENTER PIT

Location: First Street, just west of City Hall

Eyesore Factor: This often graffiti-covered, cement rectangle immediately west of City Hall and north of the Times building has long been a http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2007/10/08/news/news04.txt" target="_blank">blight spot in the heart of the Civic Center. The state-owned property near the glossy new LAPD headquarters once held a state office building, which was razed after suffering damage in the 1971 Sylmar earthquake. It was targeted for a new office-retail project in the 1980s, but that deal fell apart after the Downtown office market turndown of the early ’90s. The property has since housed a homeless encampment (later cleaned out), and in the last several years has served as prime real estate for taggers, with officials being slow to whitewash it.

What’s Next?: The state Department of General Services expects to produce a report on options for the site, said DGS spokesman Eric Lamoureux. The report will analyze the cost and feasibility of possibilities such as constructing government office space there, leasing the land to a developer or selling it. There is no timeline for when a plan might move forward.

COMMERCIAL EXCHANGE BUILDING

Location: 416 W. Eighth St.

Eyesore Factor: This shuttered, 13-story property at the southwest corner of Eighth and Olive streets occupies a key location on the border of the Fashion District and South Park. It stands across the street from the Bristol Hotel, which is currently being renovated, and businesses including the Italian restaurant Colori Kitchen and the Golden Gopher bar. The building, designed by prominent architects Walker and Eisen, has been owned for more than eight years by the Kianmahd family and its partners, according to title documents. Previous renovation plans were thwarted by infighting among partners and later, the economy, said co-owner Bruce Kianmahd.

What’s Next?: There are no current development plans for the building, said Kianmahd. The ownership group may sell the property or explore redevelopment options once the economy improves.

EMBASSY HOTEL AND AUDITORIUM

Location: 851 S. Grand Ave.

Eyesore Factor: This eight-story, 1913 building, originally known as the Trinity Auditorium, is a city-designated historic landmark owned by the New York-based http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2010/02/17/news/doc4b75ef9f3dc5e711360635.txt" target="_blank">Chetrit Group. The building was previously owned and used as a dormitory by the University of Southern California, but has stood vacant since the mid-1990s. In 2005 the owner-developers announced a $30 million plan to transform the property into an upscale hotel, but the operator later dropped out. Last summer, the Chetrits submitted a different hotel plan to the city’s Cultural Heritage Commission. The property is just north of the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising and a block east of the Ralphs supermarket.

What’s Next?: Plans to turn the building into a hotel are still moving forward, said a consultant, though the proposal is in the design phase and there is no current timeline for completion.

FEDERAL COURTHOUSE SITE

Location: First Street and Broadway

Eyesore Factor: A prime 3.6-acre plot that once held a state office building is now a fenced-off hole. Congress had appropriated $314 million to build a federal courthouse on the property; the structure would have included 41 courtrooms, judges’ chambers and office space for federal agencies. However, the plan stalled in 2007 after the project’s budget skyrocketed to $1 billion. The U.S. General Services Administration then went back to the drawing board, and there has been no movement on the property since. Meanwhile, in the recent rains the hole became a mini-lake, complete with greenish water and garbage-strewn banks.

What’s Next?: The courthouse proposal remains on hold while officials rework the plan, said GSA regional public affairs officer Gene Gibson. There is no timeline for starting construction.

GARFIELD BUILDING

Location: 403 W. Eighth St.

Eyesore Factor: This 1929 building, designed by architect Claud Beelman (who also designed Downtown’s turquoise Eastern Columbia Building), is not only a city-designated Historic-Cultural Monument, but also occupies a slot on the National Register of Historic Places. The 12-story, Art Deco-style former office structure at the northwest corner of Eighth and Hill streets boasts unique visual flourishes, such as an ornate entrance awning with a sunburst pattern on its underside. Brothers Shlomo, Yoab and Sammy Botach, along with several partners, have owned the property since 1991. The building has remained vacant that entire time. A $10 million plan to convert it into housing was scrapped because of budget issues, said Sammy Botach.

What’s Next?: The owners plan to embark on a $6 million-$7 million renovation to make the property a functioning office building, Sammy Botach said, but there is no timeline.

GIANNINI PLACE

Location: 649 S. Olive St.

Eyesore Factor: This city-designated Historic-Cultural Monument, erected in 1922, has stood empty for more than a decade. The lavish 12-story building at the northwest corner of Seventh and Olive streets once served as the headquarters for the Bank of Italy (the precursor to Bank of America), according to the Los Angeles Conservancy. The structure, located near a slew of recently opened restaurants along Seventh Street, is shuttered and is often scwrawled with graffiti. A few years ago the http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2010/02/17/news/doc4b75ef9f3dc5e711360635.txt" target="_blank">Chetrit Group, which owns the building, announced plans to turn it into more than 100 condominiums, but Chetrit representative Michel Attias said those plans have been scrapped because of the economy.

What’s Next?: A new plan for the property is in the works, Attias said, but details have not been disclosed and there is no timeline for the project.

HALL OF JUSTICE

Location: 210 W. Temple St.

Eyesore Factor: A 14-story landmark that once housed a jail, the coroner’s office and the District Attorney’s office has stood vacant since being damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The 1925 structure in the Civic Center has been empty since a renovation was halted in 2004 when questions arose over the extent of the damage and the cost to fix it. County officials have said that the price to restore the building could reach as high as $300 million. Still, there has been http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2009/12/04/news/doc4b16ca16d389e683820897.txt" target="_blank">recent movement: The County Board of Supervisors voted Dec. 1 to initiate a new study that will analyze the feasibility of restoring the property, and officials indicated the renovation price could have dropped.

What’s Next?: The supervisors expect to receive the feasibility report soon, said Tony Bell, communications deputy for Supervisor Mike Antonovich. After that, the county would likely solicit bids from contractors to carry out the renovations. Timing would depend on the estimated budget once a course of action is selected, Bell said.

HOTEL CLARK

Location: 426 S. Hill St.

Eyesore Factor: This 11-story, long-vacant former hotel stands on Hill Street just south of Fourth Street, where it occupies a prominent plot near Pershing Square and the residential projects Metro 417 and the Title Guarantee Lofts. The building, once owned by the People’s Republic of China, is also part of the Chetrit Group’s portfolio; the company has controlled it since the late 1990s. Two years ago, Chetrit officials said that like the Embassy, the Clark would be turned into a boutique hotel. No work has been seen at the site since.

What’s Next?: The owners have not disclosed any current plans for the property.

L.A. CENTRAL

Location: Figueroa and 11th streets

Eyesore Factor: A four-acre parcel between L.A. Live and the Palm restaurant served until recently as a parking lot, but now sits fenced off. The property had been slated to hold New York developer the Moinian Group’s $1 billion L.A. Central project, conceived as a complement to L.A Live and planned to include retail, condominiums, restaurants and a hotel. There has been no movement toward construction, however, and Wachovia bank (since acquired by Wells Fargo) last year http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2009/11/20/news/doc4b0731a243675030358522.txt" target="_blank">initiated foreclosure proceedings on the property after Moinian defaulted on a $55 million loan (the bank also recently filed a lawsuit over the debt). Another legal dispute, this one over parking revenue with L.A. Live developer the Anschutz Entertainment Group (which previously owned the site), led to the lot’s closure.

What’s Next?: The Moinian Group is still negotiating with the bank to hold on to the land, said Moinian director of development Oskar Brecher. There is no timeline for construction.

page 1, 03/22/2010

©Los Angeles Downtown News. Reprinting items retrieved from the archives are for personal use only. They may not be reproduced or retransmitted without permission of the Los Angeles Downtown News. If you would like to re-distribute anything from the Los Angeles Downtown News Archives, please call our permissions department at (213) 481-1448.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

17 comments:

  • anonymous posted at 2:56 pm on Tue, Mar 30, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    Wow! It's 2010, and those buildings are still in that condition. The Clark, and other sites should be consider for Homeless, and low-income individuals in the surrounding area or those that pass a screening process to obtain low-income housing. Los Angeles, is consider by many to be the Homeless Capital of the USofA. All those properties abandoned, and local organizations can't get assistance with the city to grant them the property to develop affordable housing.

     
  • anonymous posted at 5:53 am on Fri, Mar 26, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    I'm surprised the Hotel Rossyln didn't make the list with its garish signs. They really put a damper on the skyline as seen form the biscuit/toy loft area.

     
  • anonymous posted at 4:21 am on Fri, Mar 26, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    @Fred -- agree completely on the Bonaventure! Too bad the state/city/private investors are all broke these days. Really puts the kibosh on possible improvement projects. Guess we'll have to wait awhile longer to see some of these sites restored to some kind of glory.

     
  • anonymous posted at 2:15 pm on Thu, Mar 25, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    I think the day of billion dollar government buildings (outside of DC ) are gone. LA needs to get on with other plans including lower density development on these properties.

     
  • anonymous posted at 9:09 am on Thu, Mar 25, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    Easy, hands down.....The rediculous, outdated, disgraceful BONEVENTURE HOTEL BUILDING!!!!!!

     
  • anonymous posted at 6:34 am on Thu, Mar 25, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    I agree with comments re Garfield building and the flag. I am not even a US citizen but it is a shame that LA's beautiful skyline is spoiled by the way the flag is (not) flying. The building could be as beautiful as the one I live in and see it from - the Eastern Columbia.

     
  • anonymous posted at 11:11 am on Wed, Mar 24, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    What is going on with the old Hearld Examiner Building on 11th st. It is a cool building and it would be great as a mall with upscale retail.

     
  • Daniel Tyukody posted at 6:49 am on Wed, Mar 24, 2010.

    BookemDan-O Posts: 0

    On the topic of the Garfield Building: viewed from the south and east it frames the downtown skyline behind it with what should be a beautiful sight, but it's marred by the disrespectful way that building flys the American flag. Only one end of the flag is attached to the flagpole, and the result is that our flag flaps like a rag in the wind. I have called up the owners (or at least the number posted outside the building) several times over several months to complain and have explained the problem patiently, but have never gotten past the receptionist, or had my phone calls returned. There's no requirement that a building owner fly the flag, but if one chooses to do so it should be done respectfully. This has gone on for over a year. Hang it right or take it down, but don't let Old Glory flap in the breeze like a dishtowel. An inquiry by some member of the press might assist in curing this disgraceful eyesore.

     
  • anonymous posted at 5:37 am on Wed, Mar 24, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    Interesting article. We should do everything in our power, within reason, to conserve the historic properties which are actually worthy of conserving. The detail and architecture in some of these historic buildings will never be recreated again. The craftsmanship and materials used in their construction are no longer an option due to either process or prices. These buildings should be identified, evaluated and designated as renovation projects with the ultimate goal of being used as businesses or housing with all the modern amenities of today with the charm and grace of yester-year's craftsmnaship.

     
  • Sue Laris posted at 5:51 pm on Mon, Mar 22, 2010.

    sue Posts: 118 Staff

    Hope people saw Channel 5 News at 10 Monday night. Did a whole piece with L.A. Downtown News Executive Editor Jon Regardie on this list of Downtown's Worst Eyesores, and they did it right. Channel 5 (and of course not Jon) didn't trash Downtown. Channel 5 News understood and showed how many great things there are Downtown, but that there are these missed opportunities. And of course they did make the standard Downtown joke about the pit at 1st and Hill that now has a lake in the bottom of it: "Maybe they could just throw some fish in there." Probably half of Downtown has made the same joke. Kind of fun that everyone is of the same mind. Wish they'd fix it, though.-Sue Laris, Editor and Publisher, L.A. Downtown News

     
  • anonymous posted at 3:24 pm on Mon, Mar 22, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    Thanks Sue, for the speedy summary on how crowded your production schedule is. I always appreciate the Downtown News when I visit the city center, especially the dependable color-coded map.Thanks, DouglasLong Beach

     
  • Sue Laris posted at 3:40 am on Mon, Mar 22, 2010.

    sue Posts: 118 Staff

    Carter, there are five photos of these locations on the web version of the story. Five is the maximum our system will do with photos accompanying a story. We can do more in a photo essay not accompanying the story. That said, we could have done links to more, as you point out. But hey, we're running as fast as we can. Only so many hours in the day and all that. We do the best we can. Sorry it didn't suffice. I'd always prefer more, too, but getting the full paper out every week, plus the daily newsletters, plus the magazines, like today's Restaurant Guide, is whew. Not a complaint. We enjoy our work. A lot. Just explaining why. Thanks for commenting.-Sue Laris, Editor and Publisher

     
  • anonymous posted at 2:27 am on Mon, Mar 22, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    This article needs a lot more pictures, or at least links too them.It's really hard to get any sense of these places absent photos of them.

     
  • anonymous posted at 2:19 am on Mon, Mar 22, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    I do not believe your infromation to be correct on Hotel Clark. Inside rennovations have been taking place for well over a year. I live across the street and have been watching the internal progress. You may want to update this posting with correct information. Thanks!

     
  • anonymous posted at 10:52 pm on Sun, Mar 21, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    to gl21....this is the type of thinking L.A. had back in the 60's to the 80's and look what happened to downtown, a bunch of parking lots! L.A. had a treasure of historic porperties until a vision of a modern core blinded the city leaders and many of those buildings were torn down. Now, we're playing catch-up to San Diego (Gaslamp District, etc.) and downtown hasn't even come close to it.

     
  • anonymous posted at 10:54 pm on Sat, Mar 20, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    Good lord, another bunch of "preservationists" old-building lovers! Sure buildings should be well-maintained, but frankly most of us just don't care if it was "built in 1900 by Mr. X"! In fact, that is probably a sign that the building needs to go! I certainly hope that no stuck-up "conservancy commissions" etc. are able to put very minor history in the way of a vibrant new Los Angeles downtown. Their insistence on "regulate this, keep that" must add tremendous costs to any upgrading, and probably kills vital replacement. Please don't force your artistic tastes on everyone else, because that's exactly what it is. Thanks!

     
  • anonymous posted at 2:56 pm on Fri, Mar 19, 2010.

    anonymous Posts: 0

    Back in the 50s and 60s when I worked downtown it was a nice place to walk around in, shop in and do things in the City. Now it qualifies as a Hole. The Community Redevelopment Agency did some pretty good things - keeping the property owners in line and condemning the property that wasn;t fit for redevelopment. I suggest you shed some light on who might be holding back the City's growth - the City Councilmen!